"When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were
unschooled, ordinary men, they were astonished and they took note that
these men had been with Jesus." Acts 4:13
We are all ordinary people. That is the realization that comes with interacting with so many people online. The freedom to speak out against abuses of power is a wonderful thing, which must be protected and used well. The internet has become a democratizing factor in our conversations, for better or for worse, and God has used it for much good in revealing the hearts of people who were otherwise trusted and revered. God has also elevated the humble and given them a platform to speak to serious sin being covered up in Christendom. This is a good thing. This is an opportunity for the people of God to be like Jesus in how they live and speak truth in love.
Unfortunately, there is always a fine line between using a neutral thing for good and abusing it for evil. It seems that many Christians in the United States have crossed the line from speaking truth in love to abusing reputations of fellow human beings out of hateful stereotype. And it doesn't matter how many Bible verses others of us quote, how much context we know, or how much truth we speak: people will believe what they want to believe, even to the detriment of their fellow human beings, who are equally created in the image of a good God.
I write this post following a period of reflection on how to say some things I believe need to be said. Certain things have come to a head in watchblogger circles that need to be addressed, which is difficult to do well, because I have found that there is a faction of evangelicals, particularly of the Gospel Coalition variety, who think that no one but some sort of elite should be writing online. Let me be clear, many of the same watchbloggers I am concerned about have done much good in exposing evil so it can be rebuked and vulnerable people can be healed or protected. God has worked for good using Christian bloggers. God has also worked for good through the more professional Christian organizations. But whenever power and control become prioritized over loving and serving, the church has lost its way, whoever is doing the leading. (So perhaps what I am going to discuss here is a failure of leadership, but I'll leave that for the academics to debate.)
Simply, the American evangelical church is in crisis. That is not scaremongering; you have to have your head in the sand to ignore the symptoms. We are divided into factions, politically maneuvering for prominence, with a lot of pain separating us. We have a lot of headless chickens running around and hurting one another, and not a whole lot of love. This is not limited to the SBC.
Our words matter, and our use of them to build up or destroy does reveal what we worship. Some things may need to be destroyed, but something good needs to be put in its place for the future. God doesn't do things destructively, and neither can Christians. In all of this, I do not believe the American evangelical community can currently be known for its love. It is known rather by its attacks on those outside who do not conform to its systems, and for its infighting generationally, denominationally, and culturally, and in my experience and observation some watchblogging has become complicit in the problem instead of part of its solution.
The American evangelical church is showing its heart online by how it shuts down dissent and bullies its own to fall in line. It is sick. It needs humility. It cannot hold its secular government to any kind of account because it is a swampland itself. It has lost all credibility and spiritual authority in its current state.
I come to this discussion as a Christian whose God has not changed, though I have been betrayed by fellow Christians. I come as a quasi-foreigner to the American culture, despite having been born stateside and having lived here many years of my life. I was a missionary kid the majority of my life, and I identify most with fellow Adult Third Culture Kids like me. I understand the intersection of culture and the differences in how religion and politics interplay in the context of two or more countries with which I've been "affiliated". Probably most of us these days have some sort of cross-cultural knowledge, but it's still not the same as living it. These days there isn't really any excuse not to check out what other countries are saying about this or that. English is an international language and there are news' sources from overseas we can check out. There also isn't any excuse for not thinking critically for oneself and seeking to find the truth rather than accepting what we are told as objective. Everyone has their angle. It bothers me, therefore, that many Americans, and especially evangelicals are unaware of the very influences that are upon them.
To the Christian, truth matters, and truth is deeper than facts. Truth, for the Christian particularly, extends to heart motives, and requires seeking to be found.
The fact is, I have experienced the breakdown of many relationships over the past year, because the truth is, the American evangelical church has elevated narcissism as leadership. (Again, perhaps a leadership fail, but I am uninterested in that and more concerned with how we as individuals respond to it.) Whether The Gospel Coalition or the watchbloggers, the infighting has divided and conquered us. The truth seems to me to be that power and control matter more to most American Christians instead of humility and service. The narcissism that has infiltrated has given birth to the worst betrayal of fellow brothers and sisters and those outside for whom Christ died.
Christians have now been effectively divided by the worst kind of reviler, and those who support him despite his pattern of public abuses are even proud of doing so, and censure those who won't. The very watchbloggers who cared about exposing evil are silent in the face of ongoing public abuse of journalists, attacks on alleged abuse victims, and humiliating by proxy of free thinkers who dare to speak truth to power or simply ask questions. They don't seem to realize these abusive attacks ultimately endanger their own freedom of speech or ability to combat abuse.
Lately, it is the atheists, who are the ones who see clearly and truly tell it as it is. The Christians in other countries who see this may rightfully wonder why we send them missionaries, when the American church acts like spoilt brats complaining of danger while rejecting those fleeing war. If it is for freedom and love that Christ has set us free, why are American evangelicals some of the most miserly and cruel? How is it that they are so easily turned against their neighbor?
The seeds that led to this evangelical betrayal were sown in the willingness to cover up sexual abuses of the most vulnerable and precious people so the show could go on, and in the superior attitudes that lead to world missions that spread Americanity and lack humility. (Again, remember I have personal experience of this subculture, and I have not lost my faith because God is both good and love.) The callousness that it takes to condemn the innocent has manifested itself in a culturally acceptable callousness that hates and rejects innocent victims of war for the religion they were born into overseas. Those 10,000 plus refugee kids that are missing in Europe apparently don't matter to watchbloggers equal to American children, or to the "prolife," equal to unborn American babies. And the same folk who reject all Muslims, send out missionaries and thank servicemembers and their spouses, as if they really care about our emotional or physical safety.
Vomitous.
I frame this as a betrayal because that is the best description of how this has gone down for those of us Christians, from whatever perspective, who stood against this insidious bullyculture. From my perspective, it underlined for me the abject superficiality of many American Christians. Many of them reading this won't be able to get past the fact I frame it this personally- that I see fit to judge them on their character according to their actions and attitudes. Their feelings being hurt is more of an issue to them than getting to and speaking the truth responsibly when human lives are at stake. Bear with me also, because in the government of the culture I grew up in, people yell at and mock each other then go out and get drinks together having had a splendid debate, and having made progress as a nation, despite differences. One of the wider problems of American culture is the inability to debate respectfully and say tough things to each other and yet stay in the debate without insulting each other and being cruel or petty. The evangelical church here is notoriously thin-skinned, and I say this as a sensitive person myself.
Again, if you have hung on this long to hear what I am saying, well done; I respect this isn't easy for many Americans, let alone evangelicals, to hear. But it must be said firmly: this support of an authoritarian, borderline if not supremacist, and bullying regime as government is a huge betrayal of the American values I grew up loving and respecting personally, and the Christian values I hold most dear. And it is a personal rejection of anyone like me who grew up overseas. (I was told to go back to the UK for my concern for refugees back in 2015. Most Christians were silent or said the same kinds of things to me.) To support such cruel folly and call oneself a Christian while rejecting the opportunity to respect the experiences and hear the nuances of a wider worldview from a returning missionary kid: well, if that isn't a betrayal, I don't know what is.
American Christians, you have issues.
Do you not see the in-congruence of railing against Saeed Abendini's domestic abuse while supporting the Americanity of Franklin Graham? Do you not understand the craziness of claiming to care about religious freedom while praising Russia? Do you seriously not understand the brazen hypocrisy of claiming to care about abuse victims (or even being a survivor oneself) and still voting for a self avowed "p*ssy-grabber"?
Imagine what you are putting missionaries through- who love their Muslim neighbors.
Imagine how it is for their kids wanting a college education "back home" when a prominent evangelical college president lets slip the idea of "taking out those Muslims," as if all such religious folk are extremist murderers!
I couldn't even post a photo of the Obamas either as a milspouse or as an American citizen to advertise the time of his farewell speech without a nasty ad hominem comment about him on my Facebook from a former watchblogger friend who chose to delete me because I said (in summary) not cool. I had to detach indefinitely from a Christian family member for the same unrepentant uncalled-for response to a photo wishing a former president well. How is any of that behavior Christlike? Do Christians actually want division and broken relationships? Do they seriously believe they have the right to be rude and controlling? "You were bought with a price"..."Love is not rude." And I am a moderate conservative and was no fan of Obama's politically. But I can't say I respect the man on any level without being accused of being a globalist or liberal by so many professing Christians. (As if either is a slur! And as if I "need" permission.)
And all this abuse came from professing Christians.
I could have told you in 2015 that if this person were to become president, our nation would be a bullyculture and that the most vulnerable people worldwide would be harmed by that; that people would die as a result of it. And so it now is. And yes, there have been deaths already. And the worst part? Because I have a perspective from a foreign country, I am repeatedly rejected by the very kinds of Christians who were the supporters of my family of origin while I grew up overseas, and who I thought cared about truth, as all Christians should. The other day I was deleted as a friend by a Christian friend of 4 or so years for stating calmly that someone (objectively speaking) lied. That's all it took. And yet somehow, people like me are expected by evangelicals to be careful not to hurt the feelings of those who have personally betrayed us down to the core of our Christian identity and person-hood.
I cannot walk on egg-shells again- I am free and I will not go back.
Beloved, it is pure cowardice to be willfully silent in the face of any kind of abuse, and there is no Christian integrity in speaking only those truths that do not offend one’s friends. Reality is that a majority of evangelicals support a public abuser to the detriment of their testimony to the humble and holy character of Christ, and they will reap what they sow, if they refuse to acknowledge the pain they have caused so many people, not just me. And to expect any of us to stay silent about abusive attitudes or behaviors to safeguard "Christian" power and control in society or protect guilty consciences and sensitivities is, in fact, an abusive expectation. Such professing Christians with such entitled expectations, whatever good they claim to do, have caused much hurt and done much harm, both to their brothers and sisters in Christ worldwide, and to many who do not yet know our Lord.
"Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?"
Why aren't all Christians calling out unrepentant abuse?
UPDATE: March 21, 2017
The following (names redacted/comment edited for clarity here) was sent as a comment (I am unaware whether it was published or not) to a prominent watchblog, with a link to this post. I have also emailed this link to several evangelical Christians with platforms, for their information. The refusal to discuss "politics" has disturbed me among American evangelicals, because that seems to me to be a cover for complicity with the bullyculture in which we now find ourselves.
It's not "just politics" for the Christian when lives* are potentially being endangered or harmed by policy. It is also exactly the same kind of dynamics we who have dealt with spiritual abuse have experienced in abusive systems. While we have the right to set boundaries in our own spaces and ways, the "Don't Talk" rule is abusive when freedom is being attacked or abused by bullies. We need to continue to talk truthfully about all church abuse issues instead of selectively skirting some in order to keep the peace.
Comment:
I heard through comments elsewhere that another blogger was censured here for talking about politics. I find that strange, since anti-abuse advocacy in itself is political. My question to you is this: what is your motive for suppressing honest discussion of alleged abuse on any political side, especially when it is relevant as undeniably linked to evangelicalism?
This administration has put military families I know personally under intense stress, and they can't speak freely as civilians can. Neither can missionaries I know who are financially supported by folk
who voted a certain way. What happened to speaking up for those who can't speak for themselves?!
This silence and silencing is, objectively speaking, complicity with a bully- ie an abuser.
Instead of silencing the concerned who are trying to seek the truth honestly, perhaps you should try listening to how much your silence hurts those of us with personal experience and/or expertise in politics, culture, national security, foreign policy, and/or military life. I am aware there are
many who would disagree with my understanding who have expertise or experience in those also,
but if we cannot even discuss it when it is pertinent to the topic up for debate, you have effectively pushed those out with whom you apparently disagree.
As your sister in Christ, you must know, your selective silence and silencing is not consistent with integrity and truth. Truth, even spoken in love, can hurt, but it does set us free, and it does require
conversation and freedom. This needed to be said, whether you publish it or not. No response
required, peace.* https://twitter.com/AllegraJordan1/status/827158000645332992
https://twitter.com/olex_scherba/status/840247879419736064
More context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ojs1QfCAPs&app=desktop
Further Viewing Context:
(playlist: The Cognitive Dissonance of American Evangelicals)
How Corporate America Created Christian America
UPDATE March 23, 2017:
Recommended Reading:
Well said!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your encouragement.
DeleteVery disappointed in how constantly angry you are and lashing out at good people and bloggers because of it. I know you on social media. I like many things about you.
ReplyDeleteI agree with many of your concerns about the church, etc.
But when certain blogs have a consistent policy/rules of the road of saying 'no politics', and they've been doing it for years, than those that don't respect that and try to push that are reminded not to do so. That's entirely fair.
I love you, friend. But please lighten up. Eagle too.
The American public votes one way for a few terms (liberal) and then the other way (conservative) for one or more presidential terms. I've gotten used to it. I think you would be wise to do same.
Velour/MtnShepherdess
Thank you for sharing your perspective. I have some thoughts I believe should be shared in response.
DeleteFirstly, please bear in mind that anger is a part of grief. There can be no lightening up when such serious sins as narcissistic bullying and a consistent pattern of lying are being minimized by fellow Christians as a means to a dubious end. I believe it is minimizing abuse to require that.
Furthermore, we are not just dealing with politics that have no affect on life or death situations anymore. When you grew up knowing of native missionaries from the Ukraine and all over Europe, it is heartbreaking to experience the callousness of American Christians in making voting choices that affect many real lives overseas as well as at home, and potentially in our military.
Due to the stress and blindsiding divisions this quasi-cult has caused, I haven't slept well since 2015, and I know I'm not the only one.
I did not intend to comment anywhere this year, as I am finding the comment sections on most blogs very unhelpful, since Americans on both sides of our current polarization are hostile to alternative perspectives.
I did feel though that David's comment, for which he was censured, was well-thought out and respectful though tough, and needed to be heard. I was shocked to hear he was censured for it, as I believe it was appropriate in the context. There is much overlap between the ERLC and politics, and truthfully, the real reason people in the SBC have a problem with Russell Moore is clearly about his stand regarding Donald Trump. You can't get around that if you address the ERLC- you have to have the integrity to admit it, whether you agree with Moore on this or that or not.
I was also shocked at the way in which the person (Ken?) commented to David on that at his blog- it was rude to talk down to David in that way. Almost felt like jeering. Not ok. But unfortunately I have found this behavior to be a pattern with those who excuse the current abuser that we Christians are being told by a majority of American evangelicals not to speak against.
On top of this, it is entirely inappropriate for anyone to blame David for how another person reacts to seeing that particular power dynamic in play. He is NOT responsible for another person. To put him in the middle of that really upsets and angers me, because it's totally dysfunctional to triangulate. (It's also insulting personally because it suggests that Dave or I or others can't think or act for themselves as individuals- precisely the concerns I have about how TGC expects deference.)
I do not see this as some sort of tug of war as apparently some do; we wrestle not against flesh and blood. This is a spiritual battle, and we need to stick to the truth in love.
The pain behind my own comments is real, and such silencing attitudes as have existed at TWW since 2016 twist the knife. My mode of communication is something I do need to bear in mind. But do, again, remember, that American evangelicalism really has betrayed many people like me. Based on Ken's comment and attitude, and the reactions I am hearing through the grapevine, I do indeed believe TWW is unfortunately part of that systemic abuse, by creating a "don't talk" rule on what is in fact a serious abuse issue. I certainly don't feel TWW is a safe place for free thinkers like me.
I hope my thoughts, tough though they are, clarify my position for you and anyone reading this. God bless you, and thank you very much for taking the time to comment.
Melody
Hello Melody,
DeleteDid you read my reply to you at David's site? It was my intention to talk down to anyone. I'm sorry you found my response to David rude, but it was not addressed to you.
I wish you luck here. I will make sure to check in periodically.
Thanks,
Ken P.
Hi Ken- thanks for stopping by.
DeleteI find the dynamics in how David has been treated generally to be abusive, in that he was the first to be courageous enough to broach the proverbial (political/evangelical) elephant in the room at TWW, and he got shot down and tacitly shunned for it.
You were arguably intentionally rude to him, and I am pretty sure you were well aware of your apparent intention to "put him in his place". I haven't seen your response at David's blog, and I don't intend to debate this; I am going on what you originally said.
Your response to David was what I would consider textbook juvenile put-down, and that mode of communication is not conducive to safe and healthy discourse, as it communicates clear disrespect.
Thank you though for taking the time to share your perspective, and I hope you will take the time to consider mine. God bless.
Dear Velour- just re-reading your comment- in the interests of truth and integrity, which is what this is all about for me- I have to point out that it is simply not true that TWW banned politics consistently- discussing politics was not banned until sometime around the 2016 primaries/election cycle, as I recall.
DeleteI definitely remember seeing a whole post about why one of TWW bloggers was voting for Mitt Romney against the proscription of a prominent preacher, so there was definitely a time when we spoke freely about politics on that blog.
Also, I looked at the ERLC website to satisfy a curiosity today, and I would insist, as a student of politics, that "religious liberty" is indeed politics. So I stand by my assessment of hypocrisy on this front.
I will say this: I understand entirely asking people not to promote certain agendas or sides-I'd do that myself given the horrific drama that was 2016.
However, I do not accept nor understand Christians refusing to talk about or allow discussion of a significant and serious pattern of lying, alleged and repeated sexual abuse extending to possible spousal rape, and bullying of individual citizens and a free press by a political candidate favored by a vast majority of evangelical voters, on a blog ostensibly devoted to exposing spiritual abuses.
If we are to be consistent, we must discuss all this frankly, with a view to healing harm done.
Also in response to your comment, to my knowledge, I have said nothing about whether or not those who are so willfully deceived are good or bad people, so I do take issue with the assumption being made there. This is not about that. From my German studies I am very much aware and now understand better that even good people can be deeply deeply deceived.
Update- I will be unable to access blogger for a time due to other commitments. I have also felt the need to block another person I had thought was a social media friend. Friends do not assume the worst motivations from each other, even when tough things are said. I have not seen myself as taking sides, and I won't be part of that dysfunctional assumption. My protest comment at the aforementioned blog, and my posts are all I have to say on the matter. I also refuse to engage in any further conversation about anyone privately without their knowledge. There have been several attempts to pull me into drama, and I will not be part of that. I know what I have experienced in life, what I believe, how I feel, how deeply more than just me has been hurt, and I love all concerned. Anyone reading this as an attack on fellow Christians does not understand that I simply want people to know that this silence and silencing has caused deep pain. The preconceived ideas about me that I'm hearing from former friends are basically scapegoating, and I'm out. Feel free to continue to comment, and I will approve comments when I am able. I have truly discovered I cannot trust a certain clique of people, and I will not expose myself to further misrepresentation by trying to explain myself. I've said what I've said, and done what I've done, take it or leave it. In time, perhaps, it will all make more sense. God bless.
ReplyDelete